![]() ![]() I have another SRX box connected to the 650 and i can ping the tunnel interface from the 650 to the SRX100. Protocol: ESP, Authentication: hmac-sha1-96, Encryption: 3des-cbcĪnti-replay service: counter-based enabled, Replay window size: 64ĭirection: outbound, SPI: d0a4534c, AUX-SPI: 0Īnd no at the moment i have no route configured to the LAN behind the PALOALTO because at the moment i want to just ping the ip address of the remote-tunnel-interface on the PALO ALTO which are in the same subnet so i dont have to setup an own route for it. Mode: tunnel, Type: dynamic, State: installed Local Gateway: 213.XX, Remote Gateway: 88.XXXX ![]() Show security ipsec security-associations detail Pre-shared-key ascii-text "xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" Īuthentication-algorithm hmac-sha-256-128 ĭestination-address addr_192_168_253_0_24 You may need to setup the IKE policy to include the proxy identity to make sure the tunnel can pass traffic. ![]() ![]() If you need more informations please let me know. Policies are on both side any any in the apropriate zones and interfaces. Pre-shared-key ascii-text "$9$MWXXXXXXXO87dVbYGUHdbw2oJiHCApORc" # SECRET-DATA Pre-shared-key ascii-text "$9$Tz6CAt0cSeCXXXXXXXXtpOIEleY24JDH" # SECRET-DATA ID Gateway Port Algorithm SPI Life:sec/kb Mon vsysġ31078 88. 500 ESP:3des/sha1 bc72d934 2465/ unlim - root Show security ipsec security-associations Index Remote Address State Initiator cookie Responder cookie Modeħ898554 88. UP 05fc4b4bcf536e33 9833688f187823a5 Aggressive IPSec security associations: 1 created, 1 deleted Initiator cookie: 05fc4b4bcf536e33, Responder cookie: 9833688f187823a5Įxchange type: Aggressive, Authentication method: Pre-shared-keys Show security ike security-associations 88. detail Show security ipsec statistics index 131078ĪH authentication failures: 0, Replay errors: 0ĮSP authentication failures: 0, ESP decryption failures: 0 Here are some config and detailed outputs from my srx side. Where can i look to see what happens or what can i post that somebody of you can help me through that problem. We have already Phase1 and Phase2 up and running but the problem is that we get no traffic through the tunnel. any ideas? I don’t even want to receive notifications for warnings just critical and all other services and hosts are set up that way but the rules appear not to have that functionality.Hi guys, we need to setup a VPN between SRX and PaloAlto. I am not sure what rule i need to amend to prevent these constantly alerting every few minutes. I am also getting flooded with alerts for multiple interfaces simliar to the below I got the tunnels into checkMK however it isn’t performing as i expected, if we down a tunnel from the fw itself the interface doesn’t go down so it doesn’t trigger an alert is that because there isn’t a ip assigned to either end of the interface? ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |